Rare disease United Kingdom
An interesting Shire Pharmaceutical survey compares the health, psycho-social, and economic impact of rare diseases on patient and medical communities in the United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK). According to patients surveyed, it takes on average 7.6 years in the US for a patient with a rare disease to receive a proper diagnosis, whereas it takes 5.6 years in the UK.
This is interesting because the US pharma industry claims that single payer systems, which drive drug prices down, have longer wait times for essential medical care.
In the US, 37% of patients surveyed said they had to borrow money from friends and family to help pay for care, whereas in the UK, the figure was 21%. 34% borrowed from charity in the US, whereas only 18% did so in the UK.
The report claims that there are 30, 000, 000 people with rare diseases in the US and 3, 500, 000 in the UK. If true, that means there are 100 rare disease sufferers per thousand people in the US and only 51 per thousand in the UK. Why the difference?
You might also like
Com (97) 225 Final, Brussels 26.05.1997 - 97/0146 (COD): Communication from the Commission Concerning a Programme of Community Action on Rare Diseases ... 28 final - vol.12, Brussels, 2 April 1993)
Provinces and territories talk health care — Canada NewsWire
Participating provincial and territorial health ministers discussed the significant challenges they face in providing new drug therapies to treat rare diseases.
Is the disease identical to Dent's disease in United Kingdom?
Idiopathic low-molecular-weight (LMW) proteinuria is a newly described renal disease in Japan and Italy. We report on 7 patients who manifested bilateral or unilateral nephrocalcinosis, as demonstrated by abdominal computed tomography scans. Renal histology revealed calcinosis of renal tubules in 2 patients. Computed tomography is a reliable method for the detection of nephrocalcinosis in this disorder. Hypercalciuria was also seen in 6 patients. A calcium-loading test performed in 2 patients suggested that hypercalciuria was of renal origin. Although the true pathogenesis is still not …